When we are presented with stimuli in the form of things, we are prompted by the lexicality of the stimuli to consume those things perceptually as words. We see a 'cup' on a 'table' before we really see the things themselves. So much so, we consume the words, instead of the things. How much of architectural stimuli lend themselves to us as words, hiding their true experience from us? Do we often achieve closure with the words and miss out on the seeing?
Sacrifice
Architecture is the sacrifice of Time
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
In a recent class discussion, a student suggested that space is an absolute, and is a container for all things that exist. I then pos...
-
The fundamental problem of any discussion of Metaphysics is the definition of the subject matter. The generally understood definition of Met...
-
After an architect is done talking, the building stands in mute silence in its materiality in a metric space. All we have are materials with...
No comments:
Post a Comment